Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X17
Name | Cubot Pocket | Cubot X17 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 137655 | |
CPU | UNISOC Tiger T310 | MediaTek MT6735 |
Diagonal size | 4 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 1080x540 | 1920x1080 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 64 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | |
Rear camera | 16 Mp | 16 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
Battery | 3000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | Yes | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | No | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | |
Material | Plastic | |
Weight | 149 g | g |
Dimensions | 119 x 58 x 12.5 mm | mm |
Price | 74.43€ ($87.24) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot X17: Cubot King Kong Star - Compare Cubot King Kong 7 8/256GB - Compare Cubot Note 20 - Compare |
Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X17: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket’s camera vs Cubot X17’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot Pocket | Cubot X17 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 16 Mp | 16 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X17: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X17, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot Pocket | Cubot X17 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 3000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | |
Talk time | 25 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging | No |
Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X17: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot Pocket in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 137655 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot X17, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X17: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot Pocket in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 295 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot X17 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1012 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot Pocket and Cubot X17? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)
- NFC supports.
- More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 500mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X17 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1080x540.
Why it is better not to take Cubot X17 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot Pocket related comparisons
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot King Kong Mini 2
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro
- Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Soyes XS12
Cubot X17 related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Grand S2 vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs ZTE Grand S2
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs ZTE Grand S2
- Compare ZTE Grand S2 vs Xiaomi Redmi 4
- Compare ZTE Grand S2 vs Xiaomi Mi Max 2