Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X9

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X9 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Pocket with Cubot X9.
Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot X9

Antutu benchmark	137655	29637
CPU	UNISOC Tiger T310	MediaTek MT6592M
Diagonal size	4 "	5 "
Resolution	1080x540	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	4 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	64 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	16 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model		Sony IMX135
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	2200 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	3 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 11	Android 4.4
Material	Plastic	Metal frame and plastic case
Weight	149 g	124 g
Dimensions	119 x 58 x 12.5 mm	143.5 x 72.5 x 7.3 mm
Price	75.27€ ($87.24) See Details	59.53€ ($69.00) See Details

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X9: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket’s camera vs Cubot X9’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot X9
Rear camera	16 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model		Sony IMX135
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X9: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot X9
Battery	3000 mAh	2200 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	4-5 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	7-8 hours	4-5 hours
Talk time	25 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X9: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 137655 score points which is 364.47% faster than the Cubot X9, which got 29637. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

75.27€

$87.24

137655

Cubot X9

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6592M / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2200mAh

59.53€

$69.00

29637

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 295 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot X9 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1012 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

75.27€

$87.24

295 / 1012

Cubot X9

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6592M / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2200mAh

59.53€

$69.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot Pocket and Cubot X9? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)

Good performance: Is 364.47% faster in the Antutu test (108018 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 13Mp Sony IMX135
NFC supports.
More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2200mAh (a difference of 800mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X9 (advantages)

Best weight: 25 grams less (124 vs 149).
Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 1080x540.

Why it is better not to take Cubot X9 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot Pocket related comparisons

Cubot X9 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons