Compare Cubot Pocket vs Xiaomi Mi6C

Cubot Pocket vs Xiaomi Mi6C Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Pocket with Xiaomi Mi6C.
Name	Cubot Pocket	Xiaomi Mi6C

Antutu benchmark	137655
CPU	UNISOC Tiger T310
Diagonal size	4 "	5.15 "
Resolution	1080x540	1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	4 Gb	4 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	64 GB	64 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	No
Rear camera	16 Mp	12 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	3200 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 11	Android 7.1
Material	Plastic	Metal
Weight	149 g	g
Dimensions	119 x 58 x 12.5 mm	mm
Price	74.51€ ($87.24) See Details	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Xiaomi models here Alternatives to the Xiaomi Mi6C: Xiaomi Poco C40 4/64Gb - Compare Xiaomi 13 12/512GB - Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s 6/128GB - Compare

Cubot Pocket vs Xiaomi Mi6C: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket’s camera vs Xiaomi Mi6C’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 12Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Xiaomi Mi6C
Rear camera	16 Mp	12 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot Pocket vs Xiaomi Mi6C: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket vs Xiaomi Mi6C, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Xiaomi Mi6C
Battery	3000 mAh	3200 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	7-8 hours
Talk time	25 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot Pocket vs Xiaomi Mi6C: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 137655 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Xiaomi Mi6C, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

74.51€

$87.24

137655

Xiaomi Mi6C

5.15" (1920x1080) Curved Glass / Surge S2 / 4Gb / 64GB / 12Mp / 3200mAh

On Sale Soon

Cubot Pocket vs Xiaomi Mi6C: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 295 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Mi6C which got 153, it is 92.81% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1012 vs 678 (49.26% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

74.51€

$87.24

295 / 1012

Xiaomi Mi6C

5.15" (1920x1080) Curved Glass / Surge S2 / 4Gb / 64GB / 12Mp / 3200mAh

On Sale Soon

153 / 678

What is the difference between Cubot Pocket and Xiaomi Mi6C? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 12Mp
NFC supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Mi6C (advantages)

Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1080x540.
More battery capacity: 3200mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Mi6C (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot Pocket related comparisons

Xiaomi Mi6C related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons