Compare Cubot S200 vs Cubot S168
| Name | Cubot S200 | Cubot S168 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | ||
| CPU | MediaTek MT6582 | MediaTek MT6582 |
| Diagonal size | 5 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 960x540 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 1 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | ||
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 3300 mAh | 1900 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| Navigation (Positioning) | ||
| Notifications Led | ||
| Fingerprint's scanner | ||
| Operating system (OS) | ||
| Material | ||
| Weight | g | g |
| Dimensions | mm | mm |
| Price | 42.40€ ($49.00) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot S168: Cubot P50 - Compare Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro - Compare |
Cubot S200 vs Cubot S168: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot S200 ’s camera vs Cubot S168’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot S200 | Cubot S168 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash |
Cubot S200 vs Cubot S168: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot S200 vs Cubot S168, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot S200 | Cubot S168 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3300 mAh | 1900 mAh |
| Type | Removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | ||
| Battery Life | ||
| Working hours in hard mode | ||
| Talk time | ||
| Fast charging | ||
| Wireless charging |
Cubot S200 vs Cubot S168: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot S200 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 0 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S168, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot S200 vs Cubot S168: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot S200 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S168 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot S200 and Cubot S168? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S200 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 960x540.
- More battery capacity: 3300mAh vs 1900mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot S200 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S168 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot S168 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot S200 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Micromax Selfie 3
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Pro
Cubot S168 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Nokia X6
- Compare LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite