Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs Cubot S208
Name | OUKITEL WP7 | Cubot S208 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 182188 | |
CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | |
Diagonal size | 6.53 " | " |
Resolution | 2340x1080 | |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | |
RAM | 8 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | |
ROM | 128 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | |
Rear camera | 48 Mp | Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 8000 mAh | mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | |
Network | 4 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | Yes | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | No | |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | |
Material | Plastics and rubber | |
Weight | 294 g | g |
Dimensions | 174 x 81 x 17 mm | mm |
Price | 246.58€ ($263.70) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot S208: Cubot King Kong 7 8/128GB - Compare Cubot Note 20 - Compare Cubot KingKong 5 - Compare |
OUKITEL WP7 vs Cubot S208: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL WP7’s camera vs Cubot S208’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | OUKITEL WP7 | Cubot S208 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 48 Mp | Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
OUKITEL WP7 vs Cubot S208: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL WP7 vs Cubot S208, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | OUKITEL WP7 | Cubot S208 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 8000 mAh | mAh |
Type | Non-removable | |
Stand-by time | 8-9 days | |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | |
Talk time | 30 hours | |
Fast charging | Yes | |
Wireless charging | Yes |
OUKITEL WP7 vs Cubot S208: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP7 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 182188 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S208, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL WP7 vs Cubot S208: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL WP7 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 381 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S208 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1460 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL WP7 and Cubot S208? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL WP7 (advantages)
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL WP7 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S208 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot S208 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
OUKITEL WP7 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs OUKITEL WP6
- Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs Blackview BV9900 Pro
- Compare Blackview BV9600 Pro (Helio P60) vs OUKITEL WP7
- Compare Doogee S95 Pro vs OUKITEL WP7
- Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs Ulefone Armor 9
Cubot S208 related comparisons
- Compare Doogee BL7000 vs Doogee BL12000
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs Doogee BL12000
- Compare Doogee S60 vs Doogee BL12000
- Compare Doogee BL12000 vs OUKITEL K7 Power
- Compare Doogee BL12000 vs Apple iPhone 7 Ref