0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Cubot S500 vs Cubot S200

Cubot S500 vs Cubot S200 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot S500 with Cubot S200 .

Name Cubot S500 Cubot S200
Cubot S500 Cubot S200
Antutu benchmark 23782
CPU MediaTek MT6735 MediaTek MT6582
Diagonal size 5 " 5 "
Resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 5
RAM 2 Gb 1 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 8 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model Omnivision OV8865
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 8 Mp
Battery 2700 mAh 3300 mAh
Wireless charging
Network 4 G G
Sim cards
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No
Fingerprint's scanner No
Operating system (OS) Android 5.1
Material Metal frame and plastic case
Weight 155 g g
Dimensions 143.5 x 69.4 x 7.0 mm mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot S500:
Cubot P30 - Compare
Cubot Pocket 3 - Compare
Cubot P60 - Compare
42.70€ ($49.00) See Details

Cubot S500 vs Cubot S200 : Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot S500’s camera vs Cubot S200 ’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp Omnivision OV8865 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Cubot S500 Cubot S200
Rear camera 8 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model Omnivision OV8865
Flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 8 Mp
Flash No

Cubot S500 vs Cubot S200 : battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot S500 vs Cubot S200 , compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Cubot S500 Cubot S200
Battery 2700 mAh 3300 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days
Battery Life 1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode 5-6 hours
Talk time 20 hours
Fast charging No
Wireless charging

Cubot S500 vs Cubot S200 : Antutu benchmark comparison. Cubot S500 vs Cubot S200 : Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot S500 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 23782 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S200 , which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot S500
5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6735 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp Omnivision OV8865 / 2700mAh
96.51€
$110.75
 
Cubot S200
5 inches (1280x720) / MT6582 / 1Gb / 8GB / 13Mp / 3300mAh
42.70€
$49.00
 

Cubot S500 vs Cubot S200 : Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot S500 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S200 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot S500
5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6735 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp Omnivision OV8865 / 2700mAh
96.51€
$110.75
 
Cubot S200
5 inches (1280x720) / MT6582 / 1Gb / 8GB / 13Mp / 3300mAh
42.70€
$49.00
 

What is the difference between Cubot S500 and Cubot S200 ? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S500 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Cubot S500 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S200 (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp Omnivision OV8865
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
  • More battery capacity: 3300mAh vs 2700mAh (a difference of 600mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot S200 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot S500 related comparisons

Cubot S200 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.68/5 of 37
Frequent comparisons