Compare Cubot X16S vs Cubot S200
Name | Cubot X16S | Cubot S200 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 32792 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6735 | MediaTek MT6582 |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 3 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Battery | 2700 mAh | 3300 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 4 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 5.1 | |
Material | Metal frame and plastic case | |
Weight | 162 g | g |
Dimensions | 143.5 x 69.4 x 7.0 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot X16S: Cubot King Kong - Compare Cubot King Kong Star - Compare Cubot King Kong 6 - Compare |
43.31€ ($49.00) See Details |
Cubot X16S vs Cubot S200 : Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot X16S’s camera vs Cubot S200 ’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot X16S | Cubot S200 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot X16S vs Cubot S200 : battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot X16S vs Cubot S200 , compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot X16S | Cubot S200 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2700 mAh | 3300 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | |
Talk time | 20 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging |
Cubot X16S vs Cubot S200 : Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot X16S in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 32792 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S200 , which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot X16S vs Cubot S200 : Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot X16S in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S200 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot X16S and Cubot S200 ? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X16S (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot X16S (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S200 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 3300mAh vs 2700mAh (a difference of 600mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot S200 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot X16S related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi MI6 vs Cubot X16S
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Cubot X16S
- Compare Xiaomi Air 13 New vs CHUWI Lapbook Air
- Compare Jumper Ezbook 3 Pro vs Xiaomi Air 13 New
- Compare Xiaomi Air 13 New vs Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro
Cubot S200 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Micromax Selfie 3
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Pro