Compare Cubot X20 Pro vs Cubot X16 2/16Gb

Cubot X20 Pro vs Cubot X16 2/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot X20 Pro with Cubot X16 2/16Gb.
Name	Cubot X20 Pro	Cubot X16 2/16Gb

Antutu benchmark	138922
CPU	MediaTek Helio P60	MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size	6.3 "	5 "
Resolution	2340x1080	1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	6 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	128 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	20 Mp	16 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Single camera
Sensor model	Sony IMX350
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	4000 mAh	2500 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 9.0
Material	Metal frame and glass case	Metal frame and glass case
Weight	189 g	177 g
Dimensions	157,1 х 74,6 х 8,1 mm	143.4 x 69.4 x 6.2 mm
Price	132.98€ ($153.59) See Details	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot X16 2/16Gb: Cubot X20 Pro - Compare Cubot Note 30 - Compare Cubot King Kong 5 Pro - Compare

Cubot X20 Pro vs Cubot X16 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot X20 Pro’s camera vs Cubot X16’s camera, see the difference between the 20Mp Sony IMX350 sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot X20 Pro	Cubot X16 2/16Gb
Rear camera	20 Mp	16 Mp
Sensor model	Sony IMX350
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot X20 Pro vs Cubot X16 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot X20 Pro vs Cubot X16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot X20 Pro	Cubot X16 2/16Gb
Battery	4000 mAh	2500 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot X20 Pro vs Cubot X16 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot X20 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 138922 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot X16 2/16Gb, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot X20 Pro

6.3 inches (2340x1080) Glass / Helio P60 / 6Gb / 128GB / 20Mp Sony IMX350 / 4000mAh

132.98€

$153.59

138922

Cubot X16 2/16Gb

5" (1920x1080) / MT6735 / 2Gb / 16GB / 16Mp / 2500mAh

102.23€

$118.07

Cubot X20 Pro vs Cubot X16 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot X20 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 274 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot X16 2/16Gb which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1414 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot X20 Pro

6.3 inches (2340x1080) Glass / Helio P60 / 6Gb / 128GB / 20Mp Sony IMX350 / 4000mAh

132.98€

$153.59

274 / 1414

Cubot X16 2/16Gb

5" (1920x1080) / MT6735 / 2Gb / 16GB / 16Mp / 2500mAh

102.23€

$118.07

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot X20 Pro and Cubot X16 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X20 Pro (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 20Mp Sony IMX350 compared to 16Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp Sony IMX214 vs 8Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1920x1080.
More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot X20 Pro (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X16 2/16Gb (advantages)

Best weight: 12 grams less (177 vs 189).

Why it is better not to take Cubot X16 2/16Gb (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot X20 Pro related comparisons

Cubot X16 2/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.10/5 of 63

Frequent comparisons