Compare Cubot X70 vs Cubot Pocket

Cubot X70 vs Cubot Pocket Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot X70 with Cubot Pocket.
Name	Cubot X70	Cubot Pocket

Antutu benchmark	359329	137655
CPU	MediaTek Helio G99	UNISOC Tiger T310
Diagonal size	6.58 "	4 "
Resolution	2408x1080	1080x540
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	10
RAM	12 Gb	4 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	256 GB	64 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	100 Mp	16 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	5200 mAh	3000 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	5 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 13	Android 11
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	g	149 g
Dimensions	mm	119 x 58 x 12.5 mm
Price	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot X70: Cubot King Kong 5 Pro - Compare Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare Cubot Note 30 - Compare	75.54€ ($87.24) See Details

Cubot X70 vs Cubot Pocket: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot X70’s camera vs Cubot Pocket’s camera, see the difference between the 100Mp sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot X70	Cubot Pocket
Rear camera	100 Mp	16 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

Cubot X70 vs Cubot Pocket: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot X70 vs Cubot Pocket, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot X70	Cubot Pocket
Battery	5200 mAh	3000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	30 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging	No	No

Cubot X70 vs Cubot Pocket: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot X70 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 359329 score points which is 161.04% faster than the Cubot Pocket, which got 137655. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot X70

On Sale Soon

359329

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

75.54€

$87.24

137655

Cubot X70 vs Cubot Pocket: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot X70 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 564 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot Pocket which got 295, it is 91.19% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1877 vs 1012 (85.47% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot X70

On Sale Soon

564 / 1877

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

75.54€

$87.24

295 / 1012

What is the difference between Cubot X70 and Cubot Pocket? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X70 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 161.04% faster in the Antutu test (221674 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 100Mp compared to 16Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 1080x540.
More battery capacity: 5200mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 2200mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot X70 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

NFC supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot X70 related comparisons

Cubot Pocket related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons