0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Cubot X9 vs Cubot GT95

Cubot X9 vs Cubot GT95 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot X9 with Cubot GT95.

Name Cubot X9 Cubot GT95
Cubot X9 Cubot GT95
Antutu benchmark 29637
CPU MediaTek MT6592M MediaTek MT6572W
Diagonal size 5 " 4 "
Resolution 1280x720 800x480
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 5
RAM 2 Gb 0.5 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 4 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 5 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model Sony IMX135
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 0.3 Mp
Battery 2200 mAh 1350 mAh
Wireless charging
Network 3 G G
Sim cards
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No
Operating system (OS) Android 4.4
Material Metal frame and plastic case
Weight 124 g g
Dimensions 143.5 x 72.5 x 7.3 mm mm
  Price 64.44€ ($69.00) See Details Discontinued. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot GT95:
Cubot Pocket 3 - Compare
Cubot Note 20 - Compare
Cubot Note 30 - Compare

Cubot X9 vs Cubot GT95: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot X9’s camera vs Cubot GT95’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Cubot X9 Cubot GT95
Rear camera 13 Mp 5 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX135
Flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 0.3 Mp
Flash No

Cubot X9 vs Cubot GT95: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot X9 vs Cubot GT95, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Cubot X9 Cubot GT95
Battery 2200 mAh 1350 mAh
Type Removable Removable
Stand-by time 4-5 days
Battery Life 1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode 4-5 hours
Talk time 20 hours
Fast charging No
Wireless charging

Cubot X9 vs Cubot GT95: Antutu benchmark comparison. Cubot X9 vs Cubot GT95: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot X9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 29637 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot GT95, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot X9
5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6592M / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2200mAh
64.44€
$69.00
 
Cubot GT95
4" (800x480) / MT6572W / 0.5Gb / 4GB / 5Mp / 1350mAh
56.05€
$60.01
 

Cubot X9 vs Cubot GT95: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot X9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot GT95 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot X9
5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6592M / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2200mAh
64.44€
$69.00
 
Cubot GT95
4" (800x480) / MT6572W / 0.5Gb / 4GB / 5Mp / 1350mAh
56.05€
$60.01
 

What is the difference between Cubot X9 and Cubot GT95? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X9 (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp Sony IMX135 compared to 5Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 0.3Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 800x480.
  • More battery capacity: 2200mAh vs 1350mAh (a difference of 850mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot X9 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot GT95 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Cubot GT95 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot X9 related comparisons

Cubot GT95 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.60/5 of 50
Frequent comparisons