Compare Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
| Name | Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 182177 | 148199 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 2160x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | Sony IMX230 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5150 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 285 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 168*79,3*13,8 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price | 123.85€ ($142.73) See Details | 249.63€ ($287.69) See Details |
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Doogee S95 Pro’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3WT’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | Sony IMX230 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Doogee S95 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb | Ulefone Armor 3WT |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5150 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 182177 score points which is 22.93% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3WT, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3WT: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 416 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3WT which got 320, it is 30.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1534 vs 1475 (4.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb and Ulefone Armor 3WT? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 22.93% faster in the Antutu test (33978 score difference).
- Best weight: 79 grams less (285 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 21Mp Sony IMX230
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3WT (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 5150mAh (a difference of 5150mAh).
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3WT (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Doogee S95 Pro 8/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite vs Doogee S95 Pro
- Compare Doogee S60 vs Doogee S95 Pro
- Compare Doogee S95 Pro vs Blackview BV9900
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Doogee S95 Pro
- Compare Blackview BV9700 Pro vs Doogee S95 Pro
Ulefone Armor 3WT related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor 3WT