Compare Doogee X60L vs Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G)

Doogee X60L vs Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G) Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Doogee X60L with Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G).
Name	Doogee X60L	Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G)

Antutu benchmark	32121
CPU	MediaTek MT6737	MediaTek MT6732
Diagonal size	5.5 "	4.5 "
Resolution	1280x640	960x540
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	2 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	8 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	3300 mAh	2000 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 8.1
Material	Metal frame and plastic case
Weight	169 g	g
Dimensions	151,9 x 70,8 x 9,35 mm	mm
Price	56.69€ ($58.94) See Details	Discontinued. View all Doogee models here Alternatives to the Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G): Doogee S61 Pro - Compare Doogee V31 GT - Compare Doogee S51 - Compare

Doogee X60L vs Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G): Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Doogee X60L’s camera vs Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G)’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Doogee X60L	Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G)
Rear camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Doogee X60L vs Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G): battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Doogee X60L vs Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G), compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Doogee X60L	Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G)
Battery	3300 mAh	2000 mAh
Type	Removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours
Talk time	25 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Doogee X60L vs Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G): Antutu benchmark comparison.

Doogee X60L in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 32121 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G), which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Doogee X60L

5.5 inches (1280x640) Curved Glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3300mAh

56.69€

$58.94

32121

Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G)

4.5" (960x540) / MT6732 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2000mAh

93.69€

$97.41

Doogee X60L vs Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G): Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Doogee X60L in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 106 points score in "Single-core" of against the Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G) which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 363 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Doogee X60L

5.5 inches (1280x640) Curved Glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3300mAh

56.69€

$58.94

106 / 363

Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G)

4.5" (960x540) / MT6732 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2000mAh

93.69€

$97.41

0 / 0

What is the difference between Doogee X60L and Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G)? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee X60L (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x640 vs 960x540.
More battery capacity: 3300mAh vs 2000mAh (a difference of 1300mAh).

Why it is better not to take Doogee X60L (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G) (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G) (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Doogee X60L related comparisons

Doogee Turbo Mini F1 (4G) related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.77/5 of 22

Frequent comparisons