0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Cubot J9 vs Doogee X90

Cubot J9 vs Doogee X90 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot J9 with Doogee X90.

Name Cubot J9 Doogee X90
Cubot J9 Doogee X90
Antutu benchmark 23177 21055
CPU MediaTek MT6580 MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size 6.21 " 6.1 "
Resolution 1520x720 1280x600
Multi-touch (number of touches) 2 2
RAM 2 Gb 1 Gb
Bezel-less Yes Yes
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Four cameras Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4000 mAh 3400 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 3 G 3 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 9.0
Material Plastic Plastic
Weight g g
Dimensions mm mm
  Price Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot J9:
Cubot Max 3 - Compare
Cubot King Kong 6 - Compare
Cubot X9 - Compare
61.45€ ($70.60) See Details

Cubot J9 vs Doogee X90: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot J9’s camera vs Doogee X90’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Cubot J9 Doogee X90
Rear camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Cubot J9 vs Doogee X90: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot J9 vs Doogee X90, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Cubot J9 Doogee X90
Battery 4000 mAh 3400 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 6-7 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging No No
Wireless charging No No

Cubot J9 vs Doogee X90: Antutu benchmark comparison. Cubot J9 vs Doogee X90: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot J9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 23177 score points which is 10.08% faster than the Doogee X90, which got 21055. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot J9
6.21" (1520x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Doogee X90
6.1 inches (1280x600) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3400mAh
61.45€
$70.60
 

Cubot J9 vs Doogee X90: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot J9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 65 points score in "Single-core" of against the Doogee X90 which got 65, it is 0.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 222 vs 222 (0.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot J9
6.21" (1520x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Doogee X90
6.1 inches (1280x600) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3400mAh
61.45€
$70.60
 

What is the difference between Cubot J9 and Doogee X90? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot J9 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 10.08% faster in the Antutu test (2122 score difference).
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x600.
  • More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3400mAh (a difference of 600mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot J9 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee X90 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Doogee X90 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot J9 related comparisons

Doogee X90 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.00/5 of 22
Frequent comparisons