Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Doogee X90
| Name | OUKITEL C16 | Doogee X90 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 24945 | 21055 |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 5.71 " | 6.1 " |
| Resolution | 1520x720 | 1280x600 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 2 |
| RAM | 2 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 2600 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 3 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Weight | 153 g | g |
| Dimensions | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm | mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C16: OUKITEL WP2 - Compare OUKITEL C31 3/16GB - Compare OUKITEL WP16 - Compare |
61.26€ ($70.60) See Details |
OUKITEL C16 vs Doogee X90: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL C16’s camera vs Doogee X90’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | OUKITEL C16 | Doogee X90 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
OUKITEL C16 vs Doogee X90: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL C16 vs Doogee X90, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | OUKITEL C16 | Doogee X90 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2600 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Type | Removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
OUKITEL C16 vs Doogee X90: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL C16 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 24945 score points which is 18.48% faster than the Doogee X90, which got 21055. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL C16 vs Doogee X90: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL C16 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 71 points score in "Single-core" of against the Doogee X90 which got 65, it is 9.23% faster. In "Multi-core" score 213 vs 222 (-4.05% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL C16 and Doogee X90? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 18.48% faster in the Antutu test (3890 score difference).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x600.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee X90 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 3400mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 800mAh).
Why it is better not to take Doogee X90 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
OUKITEL C16 related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Blade A530 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Cectdigi P35 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K10 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K7 vs OUKITEL C16
Doogee X90 related comparisons
- Compare Doogee X90 vs Doogee N20
- Compare Doogee BL5500 Lite vs Doogee X90
- Compare Ulefone S11 vs Doogee X90
- Compare Doogee Y8C vs Doogee X90
- Compare Doogee X90 vs AllCall P10