Compare Doogee X93 vs Doogee Y300 2/32Gb

Doogee X93 vs Doogee Y300 2/32Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Doogee X93 with Doogee Y300 2/32Gb.
Name	Doogee X93	Doogee Y300 2/32Gb

Antutu benchmark	21126	20160
CPU	MediaTek MT6580	MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size	6.1 "	5 "
Resolution	1280x600	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	2 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	32 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Single camera
Sensor model		Sony IMX219
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	4350 mAh	2200 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	3 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 6.0
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	190 g	156 g
Dimensions	156 x 80 x 9.8 mm	13.8 x 7.06 x 6.7 mm
Price	54.93€ ($64.42) See Details	Discontinued. View all Doogee models here Alternatives to the Doogee Y300 2/32Gb: Doogee S35T - Compare Doogee X95 Pro - Compare Doogee X93 - Compare

Doogee X93 vs Doogee Y300 2/32Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Doogee X93’s camera vs Doogee Y300’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp Sony IMX219 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Doogee X93	Doogee Y300 2/32Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model		Sony IMX219
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

Doogee X93 vs Doogee Y300 2/32Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Doogee X93 vs Doogee Y300, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Doogee X93	Doogee Y300 2/32Gb
Battery	4350 mAh	2200 mAh
Type	Removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours	5-6 hours
Talk time	25 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No

Doogee X93 vs Doogee Y300 2/32Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Doogee X93 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21126 score points which is 4.79% faster than the Doogee Y300 2/32Gb, which got 20160. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Doogee X93

6.1 inches (1280x600) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4350mAh

54.93€

$64.42

21126

Doogee Y300 2/32Gb

5" (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6735 / 2Gb / 32GB / 8Mp Sony IMX219 / 2200mAh

43.65€

$51.19

20160

Doogee X93 vs Doogee Y300 2/32Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Doogee X93 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 66 points score in "Single-core" of against the Doogee Y300 2/32Gb which got 99, it is -33.33% faster. In "Multi-core" score 221 vs 309 (-28.48% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Doogee X93

6.1 inches (1280x600) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4350mAh

54.93€

$64.42

66 / 221

Doogee Y300 2/32Gb

5" (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6735 / 2Gb / 32GB / 8Mp Sony IMX219 / 2200mAh

43.65€

$51.19

99 / 309

What is the difference between Doogee X93 and Doogee Y300 2/32Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee X93 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 4.79% faster in the Antutu test (966 score difference).
More battery capacity: 4350mAh vs 2200mAh (a difference of 2150mAh).

Why it is better not to take Doogee X93 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee Y300 2/32Gb (advantages)

Best weight: 34 grams less (156 vs 190).
Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 1280x600.

Why it is better not to take Doogee Y300 2/32Gb (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Doogee X93 related comparisons

Doogee Y300 2/32Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons