Compare Doogee X95 vs Cubot J9

Doogee X95 vs Cubot J9 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Doogee X95 with Cubot J9.
Name	Doogee X95	Cubot J9

Antutu benchmark	35055	23177
CPU	MediaTek MT6737	MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size	6.52 "	6.21 "
Resolution	1560x720	1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	2	2
RAM	2 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	Yes
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Four cameras
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	4350 mAh	4000 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	3 G	3 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	178 g	g
Dimensions	167 X 77.4 X 8.9 mm	mm
Price	64.48€ ($69.11) See Details	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot J9: Cubot X30 8/128Gb - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 - Compare Cubot King Kong Star - Compare

Doogee X95 vs Cubot J9: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Doogee X95’s camera vs Cubot J9’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Doogee X95	Cubot J9
Rear camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

Doogee X95 vs Cubot J9: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Doogee X95 vs Cubot J9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Doogee X95	Cubot J9
Battery	4350 mAh	4000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	6-7 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours	8-9 hours
Talk time	25 hours	30 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No

Doogee X95 vs Cubot J9: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Doogee X95 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 35055 score points which is 51.25% faster than the Cubot J9, which got 23177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Doogee X95

6.52 inches (1560x720) Curved Glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4350mAh

64.48€

$69.11

35055

Cubot J9

6.21" (1520x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4000mAh

On Sale Soon

23177

Doogee X95 vs Cubot J9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Doogee X95 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 82 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot J9 which got 65, it is 26.15% faster. In "Multi-core" score 281 vs 222 (26.58% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Doogee X95

6.52 inches (1560x720) Curved Glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4350mAh

64.48€

$69.11

82 / 281

Cubot J9

6.21" (1520x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4000mAh

On Sale Soon

65 / 222

What is the difference between Doogee X95 and Cubot J9? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee X95 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 51.25% faster in the Antutu test (11878 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
Has a higher screen resolution: 1560x720 vs 1520x720.
More battery capacity: 4350mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 350mAh).

Why it is better not to take Doogee X95 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot J9 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Cubot J9 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Doogee X95 related comparisons

Cubot J9 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.18/5 of 62

Frequent comparisons