Compare Nokia 2.3 vs Doogee X95
| Name | Nokia 2.3 | Doogee X95 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 69311 | 35055 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio A22 | MediaTek MT6737 |
| Diagonal size | 6.2 " | 6.52 " |
| Resolution | 1520x720 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 2 |
| RAM | 2 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4350 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Weight | 183 g | 178 g |
| Dimensions | 157.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm | 167 X 77.4 X 8.9 mm |
| Price | 112.55€ ($129.99) See Details | 59.84€ ($69.11) See Details |
Nokia 2.3 vs Doogee X95: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Nokia 2.3’s camera vs Doogee X95’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Nokia 2.3 | Doogee X95 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Nokia 2.3 vs Doogee X95: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 2.3 vs Doogee X95, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Nokia 2.3 | Doogee X95 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4350 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Nokia 2.3 vs Doogee X95: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Nokia 2.3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 69311 score points which is 97.72% faster than the Doogee X95, which got 35055. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Nokia 2.3 vs Doogee X95: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Nokia 2.3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Doogee X95 which got 82, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 281 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Nokia 2.3 and Doogee X95? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 2.3 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 97.72% faster in the Antutu test (34256 score difference).
Why it is better not to take Nokia 2.3 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee X95 (advantages)
- Best weight: 5 grams less (178 vs 183).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1560x720 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 4350mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 350mAh).
Why it is better not to take Doogee X95 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Nokia 2.3 related comparisons
- Compare Lenovo A7 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Nokia 6.1 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare OUKITEL C19 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Ulefone Note 9 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Nokia 2.3 vs Nokia 1.4
Doogee X95 related comparisons
- Compare Doogee X95 vs Blackview A80
- Compare Oppo Realme C2 vs Doogee X95
- Compare Doogee X95 vs Lenovo A7
- Compare Doogee BL5500 Lite vs Doogee X95
- Compare OUKITEL C11 Pro vs Doogee X95