Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Doogee X95
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Doogee X95 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 267699 | 35055 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | MediaTek MT6737 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.52 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4350 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Weight | 213 g | 178 g |
| Dimensions | 163,9 x 76,3 x 9,5 mm | 167 X 77.4 X 8.9 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy M51: Samsung Galaxy M01 - Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 8/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A22 4G - Compare |
58.93€ ($69.11) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Doogee X95: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy M51’s camera vs Doogee X95’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Doogee X95 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Doogee X95: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Doogee X95, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy M51 | Doogee X95 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4350 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Doogee X95: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 267699 score points which is 663.65% faster than the Doogee X95, which got 35055. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Doogee X95: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy M51 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 382 points score in "Single-core" of against the Doogee X95 which got 82, it is 365.85% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1518 vs 281 (440.21% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy M51 and Doogee X95? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M51 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 663.65% faster in the Antutu test (232644 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1560x720.
- More battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 4350mAh (a difference of 2650mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M51 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee X95 (advantages)
- Best weight: 35 grams less (178 vs 213).
Why it is better not to take Doogee X95 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Samsung Galaxy M51 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy M51
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A72
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy M31S
Doogee X95 related comparisons
- Compare Doogee X95 vs Blackview A80
- Compare Oppo Realme C2 vs Doogee X95
- Compare Doogee BL5500 Lite vs Doogee X95
- Compare Doogee X95 vs Lenovo A7
- Compare OUKITEL C11 Pro vs Doogee X95