Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs Blackview BV6900
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Blackview BV6900 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 313177 | 94338 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G95 | MediaTek MT6757 Pro / Helio P25 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 5.84 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 2280x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 5580 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 350 g | 284 g |
| Dimensions | 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm | 164.5 x 82.4 x 15 mm |
| Price | 172.91€ ($203.20) See Details | 109.99€ ($129.26) See Details |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Blackview BV6900: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs Blackview BV6900’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 16Mp Samsung S5K3P9 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Blackview BV6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| Flash | Four LEDs | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Blackview BV6900: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs Blackview BV6900, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Blackview BV6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 5580 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Blackview BV6900: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 231.97% faster than the Blackview BV6900, which got 94338. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 R2022 vs Blackview BV6900: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the Blackview BV6900 which got 178, it is 139.89% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 871 (77.96% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and Blackview BV6900? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 231.97% faster in the Antutu test (218839 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 16Mp Samsung S5K3P9
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 2280x1080.
- More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 5580mAh (a difference of 2720mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV6900 (advantages)
- Best weight: 66 grams less (284 vs 350).
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV6900 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons
- Compare F150 R2022 vs OUKITEL WP17
- Compare F150 R2022 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare F150 R2022 vs F150 H2022
- Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
- Compare F150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT
Blackview BV6900 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9600E vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Blackview BV9600 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Doogee S90C vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare HT F801C vs Blackview BV6900