Compare FOSSiBOT F101 vs IIIF150 H2022

FOSSiBOT F101 vs IIIF150 H2022 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of FOSSiBOT F101 with IIIF150 H2022.
Name	FOSSiBOT F101	IIIF150 H2022

Antutu benchmark	102778	76833
CPU	MediaTek Helio A22	MediaTek Helio A22
Diagonal size	5.45 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1440x720	1440x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	10
RAM	4 Gb	4 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	64 GB	64 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	24 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	10600 mAh	4800 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 12	Android 11
Material	Plastics and rubber	Plastic
Weight	350 g	g
Dimensions	155.7 x 76.2 x 20.35 mm	mm
Price	78.04€ ($90.45) See Details	73.55€ ($85.25) See Details

FOSSiBOT F101 vs IIIF150 H2022: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the FOSSiBOT F101’s camera vs IIIF150 H2022’s camera, see the difference between the 24Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	FOSSiBOT F101	IIIF150 H2022
Rear camera	24 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

FOSSiBOT F101 vs IIIF150 H2022: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the FOSSiBOT F101 vs IIIF150 H2022, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	FOSSiBOT F101	IIIF150 H2022
Battery	10600 mAh	4800 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	8-9 days	6-7 days
Battery Life	5-6 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	14-15 hours	8-9 hours
Talk time	30 hours	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging	No	No

FOSSiBOT F101 vs IIIF150 H2022: Antutu benchmark comparison.

FOSSiBOT F101 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 102778 score points which is 33.77% faster than the IIIF150 H2022, which got 76833. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

FOSSiBOT F101

5.45 inches (1440x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 4Gb / 64GB / 24Mp / 10600mAh

78.04€

$90.45

102778

IIIF150 H2022

5.5 inches (1440x720) Curved Glass / Helio A22 / 4Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 4800mAh

73.55€

$85.25

76833

FOSSiBOT F101 vs IIIF150 H2022: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

FOSSiBOT F101 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 165 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 H2022 which got 161, it is 2.48% faster. In "Multi-core" score 638 vs 537 (18.81% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

FOSSiBOT F101

5.45 inches (1440x720) Gorilla glass / Helio A22 / 4Gb / 64GB / 24Mp / 10600mAh

78.04€

$90.45

165 / 638

IIIF150 H2022

5.5 inches (1440x720) Curved Glass / Helio A22 / 4Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 4800mAh

73.55€

$85.25

161 / 537

What is the difference between FOSSiBOT F101 and IIIF150 H2022? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the FOSSiBOT F101 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 33.77% faster in the Antutu test (25945 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 24Mp compared to 13Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
More battery capacity: 10600mAh vs 4800mAh (a difference of 5800mAh).

Why it is better not to take FOSSiBOT F101 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 H2022 (advantages)

NFC supports.

Why it is better not to take IIIF150 H2022 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have water resistant supports.
Have fast charging supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

FOSSiBOT F101 related comparisons

IIIF150 H2022 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons