0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare FOSSiBOT F107 PRO vs Xiaomi mi3

FOSSiBOT F107 PRO vs Xiaomi mi3 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of FOSSiBOT F107 PRO with Xiaomi mi3.

Name FOSSiBOT F107 PRO Xiaomi mi3
FOSSiBOT F107 PRO Xiaomi mi3
Antutu benchmark 665838
CPU MediaTek Dimensity 7300
Diagonal size 6.95 " "
Resolution 2460x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10
RAM 16 Gb Gb
Bezel-less No
ROM 512 GB GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb
Rear camera 200 Mp Mp
Camera Triple Camera Single camera
Sensor model Samsung ISOCELL HP3
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp Mp
Battery 28000 mAh mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 5 G G
Sim cards
WiFi Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 15
Material Plastics and rubber
Weight g g
Dimensions 190.1 x 90.6 x 39.95 mm mm
  Price 389.61€ ($456.15) See Details Discontinued. View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi mi3:
Xiaomi Redmi K60 12/256GB - Compare
Xiaomi Redmi 9 4/64Gb - Compare
Xiaomi Poco X6 12/512Gb - Compare

FOSSiBOT F107 PRO vs Xiaomi mi3: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the FOSSiBOT F107 PRO’s camera vs Xiaomi mi3’s camera, see the difference between the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name FOSSiBOT F107 PRO Xiaomi mi3
Rear camera 200 Mp Mp
Sensor model Samsung ISOCELL HP3
Flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 32 Mp Mp
Flash No

FOSSiBOT F107 PRO vs Xiaomi mi3: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the FOSSiBOT F107 PRO vs Xiaomi mi3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name FOSSiBOT F107 PRO Xiaomi mi3
Battery 28000 mAh mAh
Type Non-removable
Stand-by time 8-9 days
Battery Life 5-6 days
Working hours in hard mode 14-15 hours
Talk time 30 hours
Fast charging Yes
Wireless charging No

FOSSiBOT F107 PRO vs Xiaomi mi3: Antutu benchmark comparison. FOSSiBOT F107 PRO vs Xiaomi mi3: Antutu benchmark comparison.

FOSSiBOT F107 PRO in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 665838 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Xiaomi mi3, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

FOSSiBOT F107 PRO
6.95 inches (2460x1080) Gorilla glass / Dimensity 7300 / 16Gb / 512GB / 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 / 28000mAh
389.61€
$456.15
 
369.79€
$432.95
 

FOSSiBOT F107 PRO vs Xiaomi mi3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

FOSSiBOT F107 PRO in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1017 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi mi3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3015 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

FOSSiBOT F107 PRO
6.95 inches (2460x1080) Gorilla glass / Dimensity 7300 / 16Gb / 512GB / 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 / 28000mAh
389.61€
$456.15
 
369.79€
$432.95
 

What is the difference between FOSSiBOT F107 PRO and Xiaomi mi3? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the FOSSiBOT F107 PRO (advantages)

  • NFC supports.
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take FOSSiBOT F107 PRO (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi mi3 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi mi3 (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have water resistant supports.
  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

FOSSiBOT F107 PRO related comparisons

Xiaomi mi3 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons