Compare Google Pixel 3a vs Sharp Aquos S3 Mini
| Name | Google Pixel 3a | Sharp Aquos S3 Mini |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 176653 | 74377 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 |
| Diagonal size | 5.6 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 2220x1080 | 2040x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | 101 | |
| dxomark (photo) | 104 | |
| dxomark (video) | 95 | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 3020 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 7.1 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal |
| Weight | 147 g | 140 g |
| Dimensions | 151.3 x 70,1 x 8,2 mm | 142,7 x 73 x 7,8 mm |
| Price | 185.67€ ($199.00) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Sharp models here
Alternatives to the Sharp Aquos S3 Mini: Sharp AQUOS S2 - Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact - Compare |
Google Pixel 3a vs Sharp Aquos S3 Mini: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Google Pixel 3a’s camera vs Sharp Aquos S3 Mini’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX363 sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Google Pixel 3a | Sharp Aquos S3 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Google Pixel 3a vs Sharp Aquos S3 Mini: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Google Pixel 3a vs Sharp Aquos S3 Mini, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Google Pixel 3a | Sharp Aquos S3 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 3020 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Google Pixel 3a vs Sharp Aquos S3 Mini: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Google Pixel 3a in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 176653 score points which is 137.51% faster than the Sharp Aquos S3 Mini, which got 74377. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Google Pixel 3a vs Sharp Aquos S3 Mini: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Google Pixel 3a in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 342 points score in "Single-core" of against the Sharp Aquos S3 Mini which got 178, it is 92.13% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1211 vs 690 (75.51% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Google Pixel 3a and Sharp Aquos S3 Mini? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Google Pixel 3a (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 137.51% faster in the Antutu test (102276 score difference).
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2220x1080 vs 2040x1080.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Google Pixel 3a (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos S3 Mini (advantages)
- Best weight: 7 grams less (140 vs 147).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 12Mp Sony IMX363
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 8Mp .
- More battery capacity: 3020mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos S3 Mini (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Google Pixel 3a related comparisons
- Compare Google Pixel 5a vs Google Pixel 3a
- Compare Google Pixel 6 Pro vs Google Pixel 3a
- Compare Google Pixel 3a vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T vs Google Pixel 3a
- Compare Google Pixel 3a vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Sharp Aquos S3 Mini related comparisons
- Compare Sharp Aquos S3 Mini vs Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
- Compare Sharp Aquos S3 Mini vs UMIDIGI One Pro
- Compare Sharp Aquos S3 Mini vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos S3 Mini
- Compare ZTE Nubia Z17 Lite vs Sharp Aquos S3 Mini