Compare Vernee Thor Plus vs Gretel GT6000

Vernee Thor Plus vs Gretel GT6000 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vernee Thor Plus with Gretel GT6000.
Name	Vernee Thor Plus	Gretel GT6000

Antutu benchmark	42551	32786
CPU	MediaTek MT6753	MediaTek MT6737
Diagonal size	5.5 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	3 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	32 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	6200 mAh	6000 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 7.0	Android 7.0
Material	Metal	Metal
Weight	188 g	233 g
Dimensions	153 x 76,7 x 8,7 mm	154,6 x 77,3 x 10,6 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Vernee models here Alternatives to the Vernee Thor Plus:	Discontinued. View all Gretel models here Alternatives to the Gretel GT6000:

Vernee Thor Plus vs Gretel GT6000: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor Plus’s camera vs Gretel GT6000’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Vernee Thor Plus	Gretel GT6000
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	LED flash

Vernee Thor Plus vs Gretel GT6000: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor Plus vs Gretel GT6000, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Vernee Thor Plus	Gretel GT6000
Battery	6200 mAh	6000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging	No

Vernee Thor Plus vs Gretel GT6000: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor Plus in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 42551 score points which is 29.78% faster than the Gretel GT6000, which got 32786. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vernee Thor Plus

5.5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 6200mAh

0.00€

$0.00

42551

Gretel GT6000

5.5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 6000mAh

98.89€

$104.29

32786

Vernee Thor Plus vs Gretel GT6000: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor Plus in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Gretel GT6000 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vernee Thor Plus

5.5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 6200mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

Gretel GT6000

5.5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6737 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 6000mAh

98.89€

$104.29

0 / 0

What is the difference between Vernee Thor Plus and Gretel GT6000? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor Plus (advantages)

Good performance: Is 29.78% faster in the Antutu test (9765 score difference).
Best weight: 45 grams less (188 vs 233).
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
More battery capacity: 6200mAh vs 6000mAh (a difference of 200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor Plus (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Gretel GT6000 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Gretel GT6000 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have fast charging supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vernee Thor Plus related comparisons

Gretel GT6000 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.64/5 of 207

Frequent comparisons