Compare Honor 400 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65
Name | Honor 400 Pro | Xiaomi Poco C65 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 1980553 | 217622 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 6.74 " |
Resolution | 2800x1280 | 1600x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 200 Mp | 50 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | Yes |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 13 |
Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Plastic |
Weight | 205 g | 192 g |
Dimensions | mm | 168 x 78 x 8.09 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Honor models here
Alternatives to the Honor 400 Pro: Honor Magic 3 Pro 8/256Gb - Compare Honor Magic 3 Pro+ - Compare Honor X40 6/128GB - Compare |
108.38€ ($125.65) See Details |
Honor 400 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Honor 400 Pro’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco C65’s camera, see the difference between the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor and the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Honor 400 Pro | Xiaomi Poco C65 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 200 Mp | 50 Mp |
Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 50 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Honor 400 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Honor 400 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Honor 400 Pro | Xiaomi Poco C65 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Honor 400 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Honor 400 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1980553 score points which is 810.09% faster than the Xiaomi Poco C65, which got 217622. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Honor 400 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Honor 400 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 2476 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco C65 which got 379, it is 553.30% faster. In "Multi-core" score 5078 vs 1378 (268.51% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Honor 400 Pro and Xiaomi Poco C65? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Honor 400 Pro (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 810.09% faster in the Antutu test (1762931 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 50Mp vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2800x1280 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Honor 400 Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C65 (advantages)
- Best weight: 13 grams less (192 vs 205).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C65 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Honor 400 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Honor 400 Pro vs Honor 200 Pro
- Compare Honor 400 Pro vs Honor 90
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Honor 400 Pro
- Compare Honor 400 Pro vs Honor 90 Pro
- Compare Honor 400 Pro vs Honor 70
Xiaomi Poco C65 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Realme C55
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5 vs Xiaomi Poco C65