Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs FOSSiBOT F101
| Name | Hotwav Cyber 15 | FOSSiBOT F101 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 359844 | 102778 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Diagonal size | 6.6 " | 5.45 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1440x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 24 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 6280 mAh | 10600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 292 g | 350 g |
| Dimensions | 174.6 x 82.3 x 12.8 mm | 155.7 x 76.2 x 20.35 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Hotwav models here
Alternatives to the Hotwav Cyber 15: Hotwav H1 - Compare Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro - Compare Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro - Compare |
76.97€ ($90.45) See Details |
Hotwav Cyber 15 vs FOSSiBOT F101: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Hotwav Cyber 15’s camera vs FOSSiBOT F101’s camera, see the difference between the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor and the 24Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Hotwav Cyber 15 | FOSSiBOT F101 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 24 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Hotwav Cyber 15 vs FOSSiBOT F101: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Hotwav Cyber 15 vs FOSSiBOT F101, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Hotwav Cyber 15 | FOSSiBOT F101 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6280 mAh | 10600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Hotwav Cyber 15 vs FOSSiBOT F101: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Hotwav Cyber 15 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 359844 score points which is 250.12% faster than the FOSSiBOT F101, which got 102778. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Hotwav Cyber 15 vs FOSSiBOT F101: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Hotwav Cyber 15 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 588 points score in "Single-core" of against the FOSSiBOT F101 which got 165, it is 256.36% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1915 vs 638 (200.16% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Hotwav Cyber 15 and FOSSiBOT F101? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav Cyber 15 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 250.12% faster in the Antutu test (257066 score difference).
- Best weight: 58 grams less (292 vs 350).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 24Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1440x720.
Why it is better not to take Hotwav Cyber 15 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the FOSSiBOT F101 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 10600mAh vs 6280mAh (a difference of 4320mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take FOSSiBOT F101 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The advantages of both models
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Hotwav Cyber 15 related comparisons
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav W11
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav H1
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav Cyber X Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
FOSSiBOT F101 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL WP22 vs FOSSiBOT F101
- Compare OUKITEL WP23 vs FOSSiBOT F101
- Compare FOSSiBOT F101 vs OUKITEL WP5 Pro
- Compare Blackview BV5300 Pro vs FOSSiBOT F101
- Compare FOSSiBOT F101 vs OUKITEL WP20