Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC
| Name | Hotwav Cyber 15 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 359844 | 285662 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Diagonal size | 6.6 " | 6.67 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 108 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Samsung S5KHM3 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 6280 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 292 g | 188 g |
| Dimensions | 174.6 x 82.3 x 12.8 mm | 162.24 x 75.55 x 7.97 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Hotwav models here
Alternatives to the Hotwav Cyber 15: Hotwav CYBER 8 4/64GB - Compare Hotwav CYBER 7 5G - Compare Hotwav T5 Max - Compare |
152.75€ ($163.63) See Details |
Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Hotwav Cyber 15’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G’s camera, see the difference between the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor and the 108Mp Samsung S5KHM3 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Hotwav Cyber 15 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 108 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Samsung S5KHM3 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Hotwav Cyber 15 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6280 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Hotwav Cyber 15 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 359844 score points which is 25.97% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC, which got 285662. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Hotwav Cyber 15 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 588 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC which got 381, it is 54.33% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1915 vs 1611 (18.87% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Hotwav Cyber 15 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav Cyber 15 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 25.97% faster in the Antutu test (74182 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 108Mp Samsung S5KHM3
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 16Mp .
- More battery capacity: 6280mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 1280mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Hotwav Cyber 15 (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC (advantages)
- Best weight: 104 grams less (188 vs 292).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Hotwav Cyber 15 related comparisons
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav Cyber X Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Hotwav Cyber 15
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav W11
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav H1
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A25 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A34 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 12S vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
- Compare Blackview Shark 8 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G vs Xiaomi Chiron