Compare Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C75
| Name | Hotwav Cyber X Pro | Xiaomi Poco C75 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 358722 | 244377 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G81 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.88 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1640 x 720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Battery | 10200 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 380 g | 204 g |
| Dimensions | 181.8 x 85.1 x 17.5 mm | 171.88 x 77.8 x 8.22 mm |
| Price | 164.36€ ($190.45) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Poco C75: Xiaomi Redmi 10C 4/64GB non-NFC - Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s 4/64GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 8/256GB NFC - Compare |
Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C75: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Hotwav Cyber X Pro’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco C75’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 50Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Hotwav Cyber X Pro | Xiaomi Poco C75 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C75: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C75, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Hotwav Cyber X Pro | Xiaomi Poco C75 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10200 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C75: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Hotwav Cyber X Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 358722 score points which is 46.79% faster than the Xiaomi Poco C75, which got 244377. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C75: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Hotwav Cyber X Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 589 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco C75 which got 391, it is 50.64% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1885 vs 1391 (35.51% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Hotwav Cyber X Pro and Xiaomi Poco C75? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav Cyber X Pro (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 46.79% faster in the Antutu test (114345 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 50Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp Samsung S5K3P3 vs 13Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1640 x 720.
- More battery capacity: 10200mAh vs 5160mAh (a difference of 5040mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Hotwav Cyber X Pro (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C75 (advantages)
- Best weight: 176 grams less (204 vs 380).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C75 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Hotwav Cyber X Pro related comparisons
- Compare Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs Hotwav Cyber X
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro vs Hotwav Cyber X Pro
- Compare Hotwav Hyper 7 Pro vs Hotwav Cyber X Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs Hotwav CYBER 7 5G
Xiaomi Poco C75 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 14C vs Xiaomi Poco C75
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s vs Xiaomi Poco C75
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Xiaomi Redmi 12
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C75