Compare Hotwav Cyber X vs Cubot KingKong Power
| Name | Hotwav Cyber X | Cubot KingKong Power |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 353889 | 199835 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek MT8788 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.5 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 10200 mAh | 10600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 380 g | 382 g |
| Dimensions | 181.8 x 85.1 x 17.5 mm | 169.9 x 80.2 x 20 mm |
| Price | 139.77€ ($160.45) See Details | 119.36€ ($137.02) See Details |
Hotwav Cyber X vs Cubot KingKong Power: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Hotwav Cyber X’s camera vs Cubot KingKong Power’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 48Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Hotwav Cyber X | Cubot KingKong Power |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Hotwav Cyber X vs Cubot KingKong Power: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Hotwav Cyber X vs Cubot KingKong Power, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Hotwav Cyber X | Cubot KingKong Power |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10200 mAh | 10600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Hotwav Cyber X vs Cubot KingKong Power: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Hotwav Cyber X in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 353889 score points which is 77.09% faster than the Cubot KingKong Power, which got 199835. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Hotwav Cyber X vs Cubot KingKong Power: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Hotwav Cyber X in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 587 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot KingKong Power which got 328, it is 78.96% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1876 vs 1485 (26.33% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Hotwav Cyber X and Cubot KingKong Power? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav Cyber X (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 77.09% faster in the Antutu test (154054 score difference).
- Best weight: 2 grams less (380 vs 382).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 48Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 2400x1080.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Hotwav Cyber X (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong Power (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 10600mAh vs 10200mAh (a difference of 400mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong Power (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
Hotwav Cyber X related comparisons
- Compare Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs Hotwav Cyber X
- Compare Hotwav Cyber X vs Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro
- Compare Cubot King Kong 9 vs Hotwav Cyber X
- Compare Hotwav Cyber X vs Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber X vs Hotwav W10
Cubot KingKong Power related comparisons
- Compare Cubot KingKong 8 vs Cubot KingKong Power
- Compare Cubot King Kong 9 vs Cubot KingKong Power
- Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot KingKong Power
- Compare Blackview BV9300 vs Cubot KingKong Power
- Compare Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot P80