Compare Hotwav W11 vs Xiaomi Poco C65
| Name | Hotwav W11 | Xiaomi Poco C65 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 237786 | 217622 |
| CPU | MediaTek MT8788 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Diagonal size | 6.6 " | 6.74 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 20000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 563 g | 192 g |
| Dimensions | 176.6 x 84.8 x 16.8 mm | 168 x 78 x 8.09 mm |
| Price | 125.19€ ($147.00) See Details | 107.00€ ($125.65) See Details |
Hotwav W11 vs Xiaomi Poco C65: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Hotwav W11’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco C65’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Hotwav W11 | Xiaomi Poco C65 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Hotwav W11 vs Xiaomi Poco C65: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Hotwav W11 vs Xiaomi Poco C65, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Hotwav W11 | Xiaomi Poco C65 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 20000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Hotwav W11 vs Xiaomi Poco C65: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Hotwav W11 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 237786 score points which is 9.27% faster than the Xiaomi Poco C65, which got 217622. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Hotwav W11 vs Xiaomi Poco C65: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Hotwav W11 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 344 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco C65 which got 379, it is -9.23% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1474 vs 1378 (6.97% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Hotwav W11 and Xiaomi Poco C65? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav W11 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 9.27% faster in the Antutu test (20164 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp Samsung S5K3P3 vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 20000mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 15000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Hotwav W11 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C65 (advantages)
- Best weight: 371 grams less (192 vs 563).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C65 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Hotwav W11 related comparisons
- Compare Hotwav W11 vs Hotwav Note 13 Pro
- Compare Hotwav W11 vs Hotwav T7
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav W11
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro vs Hotwav W11
- Compare OUKITEL WP30 Pro vs Hotwav W11
Xiaomi Poco C65 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Realme C55
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5 vs Xiaomi Poco C65