Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs OUKITEL C11
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 367366 | 21166 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 5.45 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 960x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 15000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 465 g | 176 g |
| Dimensions | 176.4 x 81.8 x 19.9 mm | 146,6 x 70 x 10,3 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all IIIF150 models here
Alternatives to the IIIF150 B2 Ultra: IIIF150 B2021 - Compare IIIF150 Raptor - Compare IIIF150 B3 Pro - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C11: OUKITEL WP53 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP21 - Compare OUKITEL Y4800 - Compare |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs OUKITEL C11: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 B2 Ultra’s camera vs OUKITEL C11’s camera, see the difference between the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs OUKITEL C11: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs OUKITEL C11, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | OUKITEL C11 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 15000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs OUKITEL C11: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 367366 score points which is 1635.64% faster than the OUKITEL C11, which got 21166. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs OUKITEL C11: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 595 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C11 which got 65, it is 815.38% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1921 vs 222 (765.32% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 B2 Ultra and OUKITEL C11? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B2 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1635.64% faster in the Antutu test (346200 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 960x480.
- More battery capacity: 15000mAh vs 3400mAh (a difference of 11600mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B2 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C11 (advantages)
- Best weight: 289 grams less (176 vs 465).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C11 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
IIIF150 B2 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B2 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B1 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 Raptor
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 R2022
OUKITEL C11 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C11 vs OUKITEL C12
- Compare HomTom HT16 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare OUKITEL C8 vs OUKITEL C11
- Compare Leagoo M9 vs OUKITEL C11