Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 367366 | 176833 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.3 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 25 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Battery | 15000 mAh | 4050 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 465 g | 218 g |
| Dimensions | 176.4 x 81.8 x 19.9 mm | 159,9 x 76,7 x 9,9 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all IIIF150 models here
Alternatives to the IIIF150 B2 Ultra: IIIF150 B1 Pro - Compare IIIF150 H2022 - Compare IIIF150 B2021 - Compare |
440.00€ ($475.13) See Details |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 B2 Ultra’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor and the 25Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 25 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 15000 mAh | 4050 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 367366 score points which is 107.75% faster than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro, which got 176833. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 595 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro which got 323, it is 84.21% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1921 vs 1120 (71.52% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 B2 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B2 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 107.75% faster in the Antutu test (190533 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 25Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 13Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 2400x1080.
- More battery capacity: 15000mAh vs 4050mAh (a difference of 10950mAh).
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B2 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro (advantages)
- Best weight: 247 grams less (218 vs 465).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B2 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B1 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 Raptor
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Cubot King Kong Star
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 R2022
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
- Compare Doogee S96 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
- Compare Blackview BV6300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
- Compare Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A82 vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro