Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs UMIDIGI Bison GT2
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | UMIDIGI Bison GT2 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 367366 | 332844 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G95 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.67 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 24 Mp |
| Battery | 15000 mAh | 6150 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 465 g | 280 g |
| Dimensions | 176.4 x 81.8 x 19.9 mm | 172,2 x 83,9 x 12,9 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all IIIF150 models here
Alternatives to the IIIF150 B2 Ultra: IIIF150 Air1 Pro - Compare IIIF150 B2021 - Compare IIIF150 H2022 - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all UMIDIGI models here
Alternatives to the UMIDIGI Bison GT2: UMIDIGI Bison GT2 5G - Compare UMIDIGI Bison 2 Pro - Compare UMIDIGI A13S 4/32GB - Compare |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs UMIDIGI Bison GT2: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 B2 Ultra’s camera vs UMIDIGI Bison GT2’s camera, see the difference between the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor and the 64Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | UMIDIGI Bison GT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 24 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs UMIDIGI Bison GT2: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs UMIDIGI Bison GT2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | UMIDIGI Bison GT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 15000 mAh | 6150 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs UMIDIGI Bison GT2: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 367366 score points which is 10.37% faster than the UMIDIGI Bison GT2, which got 332844. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs UMIDIGI Bison GT2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 595 points score in "Single-core" of against the UMIDIGI Bison GT2 which got 549, it is 8.38% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1921 vs 1722 (11.56% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 B2 Ultra and UMIDIGI Bison GT2? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B2 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 10.37% faster in the Antutu test (34522 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 64Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 24Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 2400x1080.
- More battery capacity: 15000mAh vs 6150mAh (a difference of 8850mAh).
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B2 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the UMIDIGI Bison GT2 (advantages)
- Best weight: 185 grams less (280 vs 465).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take UMIDIGI Bison GT2 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B2 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B1 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 Raptor
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 R2022
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Cubot King Kong Star
UMIDIGI Bison GT2 related comparisons
- Compare UMIDIGI Bison GT2 vs UMIDIGI Bison X10G
- Compare UMIDIGI Bison GT2 Pro 5G vs UMIDIGI Bison GT2
- Compare UMIDIGI Bison GT2 vs UMIDIGI A11S
- Compare Doogee V20 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT2
- Compare UMIDIGI Bison GT2 vs Doogee S97 Pro