Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 27 4G
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 27 4G |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 367366 | 355893 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.78 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 2460x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 12 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Samsung GN1 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 15000 mAh | 10600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 5 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 465 g | 441 g |
| Dimensions | 176.4 x 81.8 x 19.9 mm | 182.8 x 86.8 x 18.5 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all IIIF150 models here
Alternatives to the IIIF150 B2 Ultra: IIIF150 B1 Pro - Compare IIIF150 Action 15Pro - Compare IIIF150 Air1 Pro - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 27 4G: Ulefone Note 12 - Compare Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro 8/128GB - Compare Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro - Compare |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 27 4G: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 B2 Ultra’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 27 4G’s camera, see the difference between the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor and the 50Mp Samsung GN1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 27 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 50 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Samsung GN1 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 27 4G: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 27 4G, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 27 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 15000 mAh | 10600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 27 4G: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 367366 score points which is 3.22% faster than the Ulefone Armor 27 4G, which got 355893. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 27 4G: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 595 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 27 4G which got 585, it is 1.71% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1921 vs 1868 (2.84% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 B2 Ultra and Ulefone Armor 27 4G? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B2 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 3.22% faster in the Antutu test (11473 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 50Mp Samsung GN1
- More battery capacity: 15000mAh vs 10600mAh (a difference of 4400mAh).
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B2 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 27 4G (advantages)
- Best weight: 24 grams less (441 vs 465).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 2408x1080.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 27 4G (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B2 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 Raptor
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B1 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 R2022
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
Ulefone Armor 27 4G related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 18T vs Ulefone Armor 27 4G
- Compare Ulefone Armor 27 4G vs Ulefone Armor X12
- Compare Ulefone Armor 27 4G vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare Ulefone Armor 27 4G vs Ulefone Armor X8
- Compare Ulefone Armor 27 4G vs Ulefone Armor 17 Pro