Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 367366 | 75404 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Samsung S5K3P3 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 15000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 465 g | 164 g |
| Dimensions | 176.4 x 81.8 x 19.9 mm | 150 x 76 x 8.65 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all IIIF150 models here
Alternatives to the IIIF150 B2 Ultra: IIIF150 Action 15 Pro - Compare IIIF150 B1 Pro - Compare IIIF150 B2021 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 6/64Gb - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 10C 3/64GB non-NFC - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40 Game Enhanced Version 12/256Gb - Compare |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 B2 Ultra’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor and the 16Mp Samsung S5K3P3 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Samsung S5K3P3 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 B2 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 15000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 367366 score points which is 387.20% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb, which got 75404. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 595 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1921 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 B2 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B2 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 387.20% faster in the Antutu test (291962 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 16Mp Samsung S5K3P3
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 1920x1080.
- More battery capacity: 15000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 11000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B2 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 301 grams less (164 vs 465).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
IIIF150 B2 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B2 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 Raptor
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B1 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 R2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 4
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro vs Meizu M3 Note
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro vs Vernee Apollo Lite