0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong ES

IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong ES Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of IIIF150 R2022 with Cubot KingKong ES.

Name IIIF150 R2022 Cubot KingKong ES
IIIF150 R2022 Cubot KingKong ES
Antutu benchmark 313177 255482
CPU MediaTek Helio G95 UNISOC Tiger T606
Diagonal size 6.78 " 6.56 "
Resolution 2460x1080 1612х720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 8 Gb 6 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 128 GB 128 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 64 Mp 48 Mp
Camera Four cameras Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 16 Mp
Battery 8300 mAh 5100 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 14
Material Plastics and rubber Plastics and rubber
Weight 350 g 268 g
Dimensions 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm 172.6 x 81.2 x 12.8 mm
  Price 175.94€ ($203.20) See Details Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot KingKong ES:
Cubot X20 Pro - Compare
Cubot King Kong Mini 2 - Compare
Cubot Note 20 - Compare

IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong ES: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs Cubot KingKong ES’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 48Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name IIIF150 R2022 Cubot KingKong ES
Rear camera 64 Mp 48 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Four LEDs Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 16 Mp
Flash No No

IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong ES: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong ES, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name IIIF150 R2022 Cubot KingKong ES
Battery 8300 mAh 5100 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 14-15 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No No

IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong ES: Antutu benchmark comparison. IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong ES: Antutu benchmark comparison.

IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 22.58% faster than the Cubot KingKong ES, which got 255482. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
175.94€
$203.20
 
Cubot KingKong ES
6.56 inches (1612х720) Gorilla glass / Tiger T606 / 6Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 5100mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong ES: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot KingKong ES which got 318, it is 34.28% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 1182 (31.13% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
175.94€
$203.20
 
Cubot KingKong ES
6.56 inches (1612х720) Gorilla glass / Tiger T606 / 6Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 5100mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and Cubot KingKong ES? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 22.58% faster in the Antutu test (57695 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 48Mp
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1612х720.
  • More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 5100mAh (a difference of 3200mAh).
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong ES (advantages)

  • Best weight: 82 grams less (268 vs 350).

Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong ES (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.

IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons

Cubot KingKong ES related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 120
Frequent comparisons