0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3

IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of IIIF150 R2022 with Cubot KingKong Mini 3.

Name IIIF150 R2022 Cubot KingKong Mini 3
IIIF150 R2022 Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Antutu benchmark 313177 211622
CPU MediaTek Helio G95 MediaTek Helio G85
Diagonal size 6.78 " 4.5 "
Resolution 2460x1080 1080x540
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 8 Gb 6 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 128 GB 128 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb No
Rear camera 64 Mp 20 Mp
Camera Four cameras Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 8300 mAh 3000 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 12
Material Plastics and rubber Plastics and rubber
Weight 350 g g
Dimensions 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm mm
  Price 175.32€ ($203.20) See Details 124.22€ ($143.97) See Details

IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 20Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name IIIF150 R2022 Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Rear camera 64 Mp 20 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Four LEDs LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name IIIF150 R2022 Cubot KingKong Mini 3
Battery 8300 mAh 3000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 4-5 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode 14-15 hours 6-7 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No No

IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3: Antutu benchmark comparison. IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3: Antutu benchmark comparison.

IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 47.99% faster than the Cubot KingKong Mini 3, which got 211622. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
175.32€
$203.20
 
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
4.5 inches (1080x540) Glass / Helio G85 / 6Gb / 128GB / 20Mp / 3000mAh
124.22€
$143.97
 

IIIF150 R2022 vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot KingKong Mini 3 which got 389, it is 9.77% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 1376 (12.65% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
175.32€
$203.20
 
Cubot KingKong Mini 3
4.5 inches (1080x540) Glass / Helio G85 / 6Gb / 128GB / 20Mp / 3000mAh
124.22€
$143.97
 

What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and Cubot KingKong Mini 3? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 47.99% faster in the Antutu test (101555 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 20Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1080x540.
  • More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 5300mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong Mini 3 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong Mini 3 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support
  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.
  • Have water resistant supports.

IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons

Cubot KingKong Mini 3 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 120
Frequent comparisons