0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 B3C

IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 B3C Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of IIIF150 R2022 with IIIF150 B3C.

Name IIIF150 R2022 IIIF150 B3C
IIIF150 R2022 IIIF150 B3C
Antutu benchmark 313177 265173
CPU MediaTek Helio G95 UNISOC Tiger T606
Diagonal size 6.78 " 6.6 "
Resolution 2460x1080 1612х720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 8 Gb 4 Gb
Bezel-less No Yes
ROM 128 GB 256 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 64 Mp 50 Mp
Camera Four cameras Triple Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 8 Mp
Battery 8300 mAh 10800 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 14
Material Plastics and rubber Plastic
Weight 350 g 336 g
Dimensions 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm 168.8 x 79.6 x 15.85 mm
  Price 175.94€ ($203.20) See Details Notify me when it goes on sale. View all IIIF150 models here
Alternatives to the IIIF150 B3C:
IIIF150 Air1 Pro - Compare
IIIF150 B1 Pro - Compare
IIIF150 R2022 - Compare

IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 B3C: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs IIIF150 B3C’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 50Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name IIIF150 R2022 IIIF150 B3C
Rear camera 64 Mp 50 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Four LEDs LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 8 Mp
Flash No No

IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 B3C: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 B3C, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name IIIF150 R2022 IIIF150 B3C
Battery 8300 mAh 10800 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 14-15 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No No

IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 B3C: Antutu benchmark comparison. IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 B3C: Antutu benchmark comparison.

IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 18.10% faster than the IIIF150 B3C, which got 265173. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
175.94€
$203.20
 
IIIF150 B3C
6.6 inches (1612х720) Curved Glass / Tiger T606 / 4Gb / 256GB / 50Mp / 10800mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 B3C: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 B3C which got 368, it is 16.03% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 1316 (17.78% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
175.94€
$203.20
 
IIIF150 B3C
6.6 inches (1612х720) Curved Glass / Tiger T606 / 4Gb / 256GB / 50Mp / 10800mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and IIIF150 B3C? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 18.10% faster in the Antutu test (48004 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 50Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1612х720.
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B3C (advantages)

  • Best weight: 14 grams less (336 vs 350).
  • More battery capacity: 10800mAh vs 8300mAh (a difference of 2500mAh).

Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B3C (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have water resistant supports.
  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

  • Have fast charging supports.

IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons

IIIF150 B3C related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 120
Frequent comparisons