Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy F12
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Samsung Galaxy F12 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 313177 | 114287 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G95 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.5 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 350 g | 221 g |
| Dimensions | 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm | 164 x 75.9 x 9.7 mm |
| Price | 175.00€ ($203.20) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy F12: Samsung Galaxy S22 - Compare Samsung Galaxy A41 4/64GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A51 5G 6/128Gb - Compare |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy F12: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy F12’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 48Mp Samsung GM1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Samsung Galaxy F12 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM1 | |
| Flash | Four LEDs | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy F12: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy F12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Samsung Galaxy F12 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy F12: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 174.03% faster than the Samsung Galaxy F12, which got 114287. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy F12: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy F12 which got 152, it is 180.92% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 955 (62.30% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and Samsung Galaxy F12? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 174.03% faster in the Antutu test (198890 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 48Mp Samsung GM1
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 6000mAh (a difference of 2300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy F12 (advantages)
- Best weight: 129 grams less (221 vs 350).
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy F12 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons
- Compare F150 R2022 vs OUKITEL WP17
- Compare F150 R2022 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
- Compare F150 R2022 vs F150 H2022
- Compare F150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT
Samsung Galaxy F12 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy F12
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A12 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F12
- Compare Samsung Galaxy F12 vs Samsung Galaxy M01
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F12
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M21 vs Samsung Galaxy F12