Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy M21
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Samsung Galaxy M21 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 313177 | 176899 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G95 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.4 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 350 g | 188 g |
| Dimensions | 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm | 159 x 75,1 x 8,9 mm |
| Price | 172.23€ ($203.20) See Details | 173.74€ ($204.99) See Details |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy M21: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy M21’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 48Mp Samsung GM2 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Samsung Galaxy M21 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GM2 | |
| Flash | Four LEDs | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy M21: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy M21, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Samsung Galaxy M21 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy M21: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 77.04% faster than the Samsung Galaxy M21, which got 176899. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 R2022 vs Samsung Galaxy M21: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy M21 which got 325, it is 31.38% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 1132 (36.93% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and Samsung Galaxy M21? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 77.04% faster in the Antutu test (136278 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 48Mp Samsung GM2
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 6000mAh (a difference of 2300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy M21 (advantages)
- Best weight: 162 grams less (188 vs 350).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 16Mp .
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy M21 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons
- Compare F150 R2022 vs OUKITEL WP17
- Compare F150 R2022 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare F150 R2022 vs F150 H2022
- Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
- Compare F150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT
Samsung Galaxy M21 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M21 vs Samsung Galaxy M12
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M22 vs Samsung Galaxy M21
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 vs Samsung Galaxy M21
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M21 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M21 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T