Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 313177 | 147114 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G95 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.09 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1560x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 4030 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal frame and glass case |
| Weight | 350 g | 174 g |
| Dimensions | 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm | 153.5 x 71.9 x 8.5 mm |
| Price | 173.10€ ($203.20) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb: Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming 5G 12/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Mi6X 4/32Gb - Compare Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 8/256Gb - Compare |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs Xiaomi CC9e’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 48 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | Four LEDs | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi CC9e, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 4030 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 112.88% faster than the Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb, which got 147114. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 R2022 vs Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb which got 310, it is 37.74% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 1340 (15.67% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 112.88% faster in the Antutu test (166063 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 48Mp Sony IMX586
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1560x720.
- More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 4030mAh (a difference of 4270mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 176 grams less (174 vs 350).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 16Mp .
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons
- Compare F150 R2022 vs OUKITEL WP17
- Compare F150 R2022 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
- Compare F150 R2022 vs F150 H2022
- Compare F150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT
Xiaomi CC9e 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi CC9e vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Xiaomi CC9e
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra vs Xiaomi CC9e