Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs InFocus Bingo 50+
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | InFocus Bingo 50+ |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 37524 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | MediaTek MT6735 |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 5.5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
Battery | 2800 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | Android 6.0 |
Material | Metal and plastic | Metal |
Weight | 140 g | g |
Dimensions | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm | 156 x 76,8 x 6,99 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all InFocus models here
Alternatives to the InFocus Bingo 50+: |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs InFocus Bingo 50+: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs InFocus Bingo 50+’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | InFocus Bingo 50+ |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
Flash | No |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs InFocus Bingo 50+: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs InFocus Bingo 50+, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | InFocus Bingo 50+ |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2800 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | |
Talk time | 20 hours | |
Fast charging | Yes | |
Wireless charging |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs InFocus Bingo 50+: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the InFocus Bingo 50+, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs InFocus Bingo 50+: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the InFocus Bingo 50+ which got 113, it is 2.65% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 390 (54.87% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and InFocus Bingo 50+? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 200mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the InFocus Bingo 50+ (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take InFocus Bingo 50+ (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro