Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Kenxinda 6A
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Kenxinda 6A |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 511288 | 21533 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 990 | UNISOC SC7731 |
| Diagonal size | 6.9 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 960x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 222 g | 145 g |
| Dimensions | 166,9 x 76 x 8,8 mm | 147 x 71,3 x 9,2 mm |
| Price | 653.04€ ($685.75) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Kenxinda models here
Alternatives to the Kenxinda 6A: |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Kenxinda 6A: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra’s camera vs Kenxinda 6A’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung Bright S5KHM1 sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Kenxinda 6A |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Kenxinda 6A: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Kenxinda 6A, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Kenxinda 6A |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Kenxinda 6A: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 511288 score points which is 2274.44% faster than the Kenxinda 6A, which got 21533. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Kenxinda 6A: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 490 points score in "Single-core" of against the Kenxinda 6A which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2757 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra and Kenxinda 6A? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2274.44% faster in the Antutu test (489755 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung Bright S5KHM1 compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 960x480.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2500mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Kenxinda 6A (advantages)
- Best weight: 77 grams less (145 vs 222).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Kenxinda 6A (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Kenxinda 6A related comparisons
- Compare Kenxinda 6A vs YU FLY F9
- Compare Kenxinda W55 vs Kenxinda 6A
- Compare BLUBOO D6 Lite vs Kenxinda 6A
- Compare Kingzone A5i vs Kenxinda 6A
- Compare Kingzone C5 vs Kenxinda 6A