Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Kingzone N6
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Kingzone N6 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 37524 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | MediaTek MT6737 |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 3 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 2800 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | Android 6.0 |
Material | Metal and plastic | Metal frame and plastic case |
Weight | 140 g | 144 g |
Dimensions | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm | 143 x 71 x 8.3 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Kingzone models here
Alternatives to the Kingzone N6: |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Kingzone N6: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs Kingzone N6’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Kingzone N6 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Kingzone N6: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs Kingzone N6, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Kingzone N6 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2800 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | |
Talk time | 20 hours | |
Fast charging | Yes | |
Wireless charging |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Kingzone N6: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Kingzone N6, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Kingzone N6: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Kingzone N6 which got 126, it is -7.94% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 433 (39.49% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and Kingzone N6? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 4 grams less (140 vs 144).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
- More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 200mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Kingzone N6 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Kingzone N6 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro