Compare LG K50 vs Cubot X9

LG K50 vs Cubot X9 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of LG K50 with Cubot X9.
Name	LG K50	Cubot X9

Antutu benchmark	76588	29637
CPU	MediaTek Helio P22	MediaTek MT6592M
Diagonal size	6.26 "	5 "
Resolution	1520x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	3 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	32 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Single camera
Sensor model		Sony IMX135
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	13 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	3500 mAh	2200 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	3 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 9.0	Android 4.4
Material	Plastic	Metal frame and plastic case
Weight	160 g	124 g
Dimensions	161,3 x 77 x 8,7 mm	143.5 x 72.5 x 7.3 mm
Price	113.13€ ($129.98) See Details	60.05€ ($69.00) See Details

LG K50 vs Cubot X9: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the LG K50’s camera vs Cubot X9’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	LG K50	Cubot X9
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model		Sony IMX135
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	13 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

LG K50 vs Cubot X9: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LG K50 vs Cubot X9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	LG K50	Cubot X9
Battery	3500 mAh	2200 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	4-5 days
Battery Life	1,5-2 days	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours	4-5 hours
Talk time	25 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging	No

LG K50 vs Cubot X9: Antutu benchmark comparison.

LG K50 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 76588 score points which is 158.42% faster than the Cubot X9, which got 29637. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

LG K50

6.26 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio P22 / 3Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 3500mAh

113.13€

$129.98

76588

Cubot X9

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6592M / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2200mAh

60.05€

$69.00

29637

LG K50 vs Cubot X9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

LG K50 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 161 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot X9 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 794 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

LG K50

6.26 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio P22 / 3Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 3500mAh

113.13€

$129.98

161 / 794

Cubot X9

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6592M / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2200mAh

60.05€

$69.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between LG K50 and Cubot X9? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K50 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 158.42% faster in the Antutu test (46951 score difference).
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 5Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 3500mAh vs 2200mAh (a difference of 1300mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take LG K50 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X9 (advantages)

Best weight: 36 grams less (124 vs 160).

Why it is better not to take Cubot X9 (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

LG K50 related comparisons

Cubot X9 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons