Compare Ulefone Armor X9 vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb
| Name | Ulefone Armor X9 | LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb | 
|---|---|---|
                          
                         | 
                
                    
                          
                         | 
                
            |
| Antutu benchmark | 93188 | 85634 | 
| CPU | MediaTek Helio A25 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 | 
| Diagonal size | 5.5 " | 5.5 " | 
| Resolution | 1440x720 | 1920x1080 | 
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 10 | 
| RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb | 
| Bezel-less | No | No | 
| ROM | 32 GB | 32 GB | 
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | No | 
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 16 Mp | 
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera | 
| Sensor model | Omnivison OV16880 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp | 
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh | 
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G | 
| WiFi | Yes | Yes | 
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes | 
| NFC | Yes | No | 
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | 
| Notifications Led | No | Yes | 
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | Yes | 
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 6.0 | 
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal | 
| Weight | 235 g | 153 g | 
| Dimensions | 158 x 77.5 x 13.85 mm | 151.1 x 74.2 x 7.5 mm | 
| Price | 85.60€ ($98.60) See Details | 66.60€ ($76.71) See Details | 
Ulefone Armor X9 vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor X9’s camera vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526)’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 16Mp Omnivison OV16880 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor X9 | LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb | 
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 16 Mp | 
| Sensor model | Omnivison OV16880 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash | 
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp | 
| Flash | No | No | 
Ulefone Armor X9 vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor X9 vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526), compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor X9 | LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb | 
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh | 
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable | 
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 4-5 days | 
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days | 
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 4-5 hours | 
| Talk time | 30 hours | 20 hours | 
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes | 
| Wireless charging | No | 
                        
 
                        Ulefone Armor X9 vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
                    
                Ulefone Armor X9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 93188 score points which is 8.82% faster than the LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb, which got 85634. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor X9 vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor X9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 138 points score in "Single-core" of against the LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb which got 273, it is -49.45% faster. In "Multi-core" score 846 vs 414 (104.35% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor X9 and LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor X9 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 8.82% faster in the Antutu test (7554 score difference).
 - NFC supports.
 - More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
 - Have water resistant supports.
 
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor X9 (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
 
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 82 grams less (153 vs 235).
 - Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Omnivison OV16880 compared to 13Mp
 - Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
 - Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1440x720.
 - Have infrared blaster supports.
 
Why it is better not to take LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
 - Does not have water resistant supports.
 
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
 - Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
 
Ulefone Armor X9 related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Armor X5 vs Ulefone Armor X9
 - Compare Blackview BV5500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor X9
 - Compare Blackview BV5500 Plus vs Ulefone Armor X9
 - Compare Ulefone Armor X7 vs Ulefone Armor X9
 - Compare Ulefone Armor 7E vs Ulefone Armor X9
 
LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526)
 - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526)
 - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526)
 - Compare LeEco Cool1 vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526)
 - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526)