Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
| Name | Motorola Moto G Fast | LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 158799 | 98652 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek Helio X23 |
| Diagonal size | 6.4 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 1560x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 3 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | No |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX258 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Metal |
| Weight | 189 g | 168 g |
| Dimensions | 161,9 x 75,7 x 9 mm | 152,4 x 75,1 x 7,5 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Motorola models here
Alternatives to the Motorola Moto G Fast: Motorola Moto G42 6/128GB - Compare Motorola Edge (2020) - Compare Motorola Edge 40 Neo - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all LeEco models here
Alternatives to the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: LeEco Le 2 3/64Gb - Compare LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb - Compare |
Motorola Moto G Fast vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Motorola Moto G Fast’s camera vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 13Mp Sony IMX258 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Motorola Moto G Fast | LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX258 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Motorola Moto G Fast vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Motorola Moto G Fast vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Motorola Moto G Fast | LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Motorola Moto G Fast vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Motorola Moto G Fast in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 158799 score points which is 60.97% faster than the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651, which got 98652. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Motorola Moto G Fast vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Motorola Moto G Fast in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 313 points score in "Single-core" of against the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 which got 214, it is 46.26% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1368 vs 921 (48.53% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Motorola Moto G Fast and LeEco Le Pro 3 X651? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola Moto G Fast (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 60.97% faster in the Antutu test (60147 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 13Mp Sony IMX258
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Motorola Moto G Fast (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 (advantages)
- Best weight: 21 grams less (168 vs 189).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1560x720.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Motorola Moto G Fast related comparisons
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare UMIDIGI One Max vs Motorola Moto G Fast
- Compare Motorola Moto G Fast vs Huawei Mate 40e
LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare Xiaomi Mi Max 2 vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare Asus Zenfone 4 Max Plus vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6 vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651