Compare LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 vs OUKITEL C16
| Name | LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 98652 | 24945 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio X23 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 5.5 " | 5.71 " |
| Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX258 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal | Plastic |
| Weight | 168 g | 153 g |
| Dimensions | 152,4 x 75,1 x 7,5 mm | 146,4 x 70,3 x 9,5 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all LeEco models here
Alternatives to the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: LeEco Le 2 3/64Gb - Compare LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C16: OUKITEL WP20 - Compare OUKITEL U25 Pro - Compare OUKITEL Y4800 - Compare |
LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 vs OUKITEL C16: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651’s camera vs OUKITEL C16’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Sony IMX258 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX258 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 vs OUKITEL C16: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 vs OUKITEL C16, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 | OUKITEL C16 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 5-6 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 vs OUKITEL C16: Antutu benchmark comparison.
LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 98652 score points which is 295.48% faster than the OUKITEL C16, which got 24945. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 vs OUKITEL C16: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 214 points score in "Single-core" of against the OUKITEL C16 which got 71, it is 201.41% faster. In "Multi-core" score 921 vs 213 (332.39% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 and OUKITEL C16? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 295.48% faster in the Antutu test (73707 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp Sony IMX258 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 1400mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C16 (advantages)
- Best weight: 15 grams less (153 vs 168).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C16 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare Xiaomi Mi Max 2 vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare Asus Zenfone 4 Max Plus vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6 vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
OUKITEL C16 related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Blade A530 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Cectdigi P35 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K7 vs OUKITEL C16
- Compare OUKITEL K10 vs OUKITEL C16