Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 326155 | 98652 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | MediaTek Helio X23 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | No |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX258 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Metal |
| Weight | 187 g | 168 g |
| Dimensions | 159,9 x 75,1 x 8,4 mm | 152,4 x 75,1 x 7,5 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Samsung Galaxy A51 4/64Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy A04 4/128GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy M31 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all LeEco models here
Alternatives to the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb - Compare LeEco Le 2 3/64Gb - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G’s camera vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 13Mp Sony IMX258 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | Sony IMX258 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 326155 score points which is 230.61% faster than the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651, which got 98652. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 613 points score in "Single-core" of against the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 which got 214, it is 186.45% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1916 vs 921 (108.03% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and LeEco Le Pro 3 X651? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 230.61% faster in the Antutu test (227503 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 13Mp Sony IMX258
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1920x1080.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 (advantages)
- Best weight: 19 grams less (168 vs 187).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare Xiaomi Mi Max 2 vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare Asus Zenfone 4 Max Plus vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6 vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651