Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 98652 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek Helio X23 |
| Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | No | No |
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX258 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Metal | Metal |
| Weight | 139 g | 168 g |
| Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 152,4 x 75,1 x 7,5 mm |
| Price | 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all LeEco models here
Alternatives to the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) 3/32Gb - Compare LeEco Le 2 3/64Gb - Compare |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 13Mp Sony IMX258 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX258 | |
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 180.23% faster than the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651, which got 98652. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 which got 214, it is 134.11% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 921 (115.64% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and LeEco Le Pro 3 X651? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 180.23% faster in the Antutu test (177796 score difference).
- Best weight: 29 grams less (139 vs 168).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 13Mp Sony IMX258
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1920x1080.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
LeEco Le Pro 3 X651 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare Xiaomi Mi Max 2 vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare Asus Zenfone 4 Max Plus vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6 vs LeEco Le Pro 3 X651