Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Letv X508
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Letv X508 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 37524 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6753 | MediaTek Helio X10 |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 5.5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 3 Gb | 3 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 32 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 2800 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 4 G | 3 G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | Android 5.1 |
Material | Metal and plastic | |
Weight | 140 g | g |
Dimensions | 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb: |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Letv models here
Alternatives to the Letv X508: |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Letv X508: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs Letv X508’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Letv X508 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Letv X508: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs Letv X508, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Vernee Thor 3/16Gb | Letv X508 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2800 mAh | 3000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | |
Talk time | 20 hours | |
Fast charging | Yes | |
Wireless charging |
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Letv X508: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Letv X508, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Letv X508: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Letv X508 which got 151, it is -23.18% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 523 (15.49% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and Letv X508? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Letv X508 (advantages)
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 200mAh).
Why it is better not to take Letv X508 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Vernee Thor
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Vernee Thor vs Doogee X5 Max Pro
Letv X508 related comparisons
- Compare ZTE Nubia M2 vs Xiaomi Redmi 6
- Compare ZTE Nubia M2 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
- Compare ZTE Nubia M2 vs Meizu Pro 6 Plus
- Compare Xiaomi 12 Pro vs Xiaomi 12T Pro
- Compare Asus Zenfone 3 Zoom vs ZTE Nubia M2